The Trickster is the human equivalent of the
Snare.
Maybe it is time to look a little deeper
into the cues that enable us to read another’s emotions,
and cues which trigger our own.
Some, those identifying children, are well
known
And are referred to as Kinderschema:
compared to an adult, a child has a
bigger head,
flatter face,
bigger eyes,
bigger, domed forehead,
a smaller nose,
rounder cheeks,
and
a smaller, more receding chin.
That many cues suggests that responding
sympathetically to a child
is not something nature wanted to leave to
chance!
All these kinderschema cues may be seen
clearly in Hummel figurines.
In addition there are simple cues for the
emotions these little figurines want to convey.
The head may be tilted or not, twisted or
not, there may be a smile, or not.
A matrix can be drawn up reflecting twelve
combinations
of these factors alone:
No
Yes No Yes No Yes
Up Down
* * * Wistful
* * * Friendly
* * * Concerned
* * * Shy pride
* * * Confidence
* * * Self-satisfaction
* * * Challenging
* * * Amused disbelief
* * * Surprise
* * * Shyness
* * * Sorry
* * * Bashful pleasure
It seems that tilting the head
(looking down your nose, or submissively
upwards) affects
perception of confidence/seeking approval.
Twisting the head on the other hand, denotes
questioning
(this is common to many mammals – my dog
would do it every time he thought I said something like ‘walk’).
And a smile denotes joy rather than sorrow
or shock or disgust.
The combinations these variables alone offer
is amazing,
but the position of the eyes also has
semantic function.
We saw in Luxo Junior how the direction of
the face denoted something as the subject of the emotions.
Looking at it – the direction of the eyes
rather than the face - also has the same effect.
But the face does not have to point in the
same direction as the eyes,
and this can create mixed messages.
Looking at something sideways is complex –
it may denote that you
are still mostly paying attention to the
person your face is pointed at,
but that something else is distracting you.
At the very least, you risk offending the
person you are talking with,
but
there is a further danger that you may trigger the ‘Trickster’ response.
This is particularly the case if the
sideways glance is made surreptitious by being brief,
or by squeezing one’s eyes to make them less
visible.

Compare, for example, these two walking
figures – the Happy Wanderer,
chin up, confident and cheerful - and the
Truant,
looking sideways, quizzically, over his
shoulder, as if to check
if his departure was being observed.
The smile and the wide eyes suggests we
should respond in a playful way,
so his mischief seems not malevolent, but
charming.
Narrow the eyes and lose the smile, and he
would be a lot less charming.
We might even dislike him
and move him from the Rascal slot
into the Villain one.
Similarly if we look above a person’s gaze,
and point our head below it, or vice versa,
we are giving a mixed message.
Are we scorning the person while pretending
to be sorry, or are we
sorry, but making it clear the other person
is still not
our social equal? Mixed messages are the
mark
of the Trickster… looking sideways, sneaking
a peek through narrowed eyes…
A masterly study in sly villainy can be seen in Peter Pan,
when Hook is trying to get information on Peter’s
whereabouts, from Tinkerbell:

So would you trust these smiles??