
Animals divide
their worlds into territories... This part is mine, and I will defend it. That
part is hers, and if I cross the boundary, there will be a fight. Any creature
that cannot instinctively ‘see’ these boundaries is at a serious evolutionary
disadvantage. And so, just as one might expect Minskyan mind agents to have
developed to recognise food or shelter, another, we can postulate, is responsible
for dividing up any landscape we are confronted with. It has to divide it into
adjoining areas according to the rules of evolutionary advantage.
In order to
successfully negotiate one’s way through a landscape, it is no good heading off
towards an area bounded by a line of steep cliffs twenty feet high, or bounded
by a river, or by a dense stand of vegetation. The eye is naturally directed
along such boundaries until it finds a point of transit - a portal - between
them: a gap, shallows with stepping stones, a bridge, a negotiable slope, or
outcrop of rocks which look climbable.

The line of the
boundary acts as one guide, catching and directing the eye of the viewer, and
the point of contact between the territories or realms too has special
emotional significance. We are pre-programmed to be aroused by such points. The
agent looks for boundaries and portals, and recreates the landscape in our
brains using these as the basic framework on which to hang other features. A
third key feature would also be line-like – a pathway through our landscape,
perhaps trodden down by thousands of previous transits by animal herds, or just
as a natural feature.